Investigating the Role of Cooperative Learning in Fostering Moroccan ESP Students’ Learning Attitudes
Abstract
Cooperative learning (CL) is a teaching and learning approach that has been sufficiently studied to be accepted as an effective method of language education, English language in particular. In all levels of education, students in cooperative situations achieved greater academic, social, and psychological benefits. Nowadays, learners are expected to be more actively involved in the teaching and learning process, especially when they work together to achieve a specific target or objective. This study investigates teaching English for Specific Purposes within the paradigm of a cooperative learning approach. It comes as an attempt to investigate the impact of cooperative learning on improving students’ learning skills and attitudes in the ESP instructional context. Through a survey questionnaire, this inquiry aimed at shedding light on learners’ perceptions towards’ their cooperative learning experience. Based on attitudinal results, the majority of respondents positively perceived the use of cooperative learning as an approach that provides them with a learning environment conducive to social interaction, peer tutoring, skills’ development, and knowledge retention. Eventually, according to the study results, cooperative learning has benefits that go outside of the classroom and learning environment. Long-term benefits of cooperative learning include the opportunity for students to practice skills that may have a progressive impact on their lives in addition to helping them acquire new knowledge.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C. & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 201–216.
Amin, F. (2020). Positive classroom environment, cooperative learning strategy, reading comprehension achievement: a correlational study. Language- Education 9, 1–14.
Andreev, V. V., Gorbunov, V. I., Evdokimova, O. K., and Rimondi, G. (2020). Transdisciplinary approach to improving study motivation among university students of engineering specialties. Educ. Self Dev. 15, 21–37.
Arnó-Macià, E., Aguilar-Pérez, M., and Tatzl, D. (2020). Engineering students' perceptions of the role of ESP courses in internationalized universities. English Specif. Purp. 58, 58–74.
Barr, R. & Tagg, J. (1995). From Teaching to Learning. A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. Change, 27, 13-2.
Basturkmen, H (2003). Specificity and Esp Course Design, RELC Journal, 34(1).
Belcher, D. ( 2009 ). What ESP is and can be: An introduction. In D. Belcher (ed.), English for specific purposes in theory and practice (p.1-20). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice.
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition (6th ed.). Pearson Education ESL.
Cecchini, J. A., Fernandez-Rio, J., Mendez-Gimenez, A., Gonzalez, C., Sanchez-Martínez, B., and Carriedo, A. (2021). High versus low-structured cooperative learning. effects on prospective teachers’ regulation dominance, motivation, content knowledge, and responsibility. European Journal of Teacher Education. 44, 486–501.
Frykedal, K. F., & Chiriac, E. H. (2012). Group work management in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 5(56), 1-13.
Gabriel, Y., & Griffiths, D. S. (2008). International learning groups: Synergies and dysfunctions. Management Learning, 39(5), 503-518.
Garcia Mayo, M. D. P. (2000). English for specific purposes: Discourse analysis and course design. Universidad Del Pais Vasco.
Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 365.
Giwa, M. (2008). How effective are collaborative approaches for widening participation in further education and training? Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13(1), 79-105
Greenop, K. (2007). Students’ perceptions of efficacy and preference for two lecture formats. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(2), 361-367.
Grisham, D. & Molinelli, P. (2001). Cooperative learning. Professional’s guide. Teacher Created Materials, Inc.
Habbash, M., & Troudi, S. (2015). The discourse of global English and its representation in the Saudi context: A postmodernist critical perspective. In R. Raddawi (Ed.), Intercultural communication with Arabs: Studies in education, professional and societal contexts. Springer.
Hewings, M. (2002).A history of ESP through English for specific purposes. ESPWorld, 1(3). (Retrieved on 21/12/2018 from http:// www.espworld.info/Articles_3/issue_3.html )
Hutchinson, T., &Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, T. R. (1999). Cooperative Learning and Achievement. In Kluge, D., McGuire, S., Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (Eds.) Cooperative Learning: JALT Applied Materials (pp.23-37). Greenwood Press, Inc.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf (retrieved on 21/07/2023).
Johnson, A. W., & Johnson, R. (2002). Cooperative Learning Methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 5-14.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative Learning in 21st Century. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 841-851.
Kapp, E. (2009). Improving student teamwork in a collaborative project-based course. College Teaching, 57, 139-143.
Kasim, U. (2015). Implementation of group work in the classroom. Lingua, 12(1), 97-106.
King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., & Beal, D. J. (2009). Conflict and cooperation in diverse workgroups. Journal of Social Issues, 65(2), 261-285.
Knapp, Karlfried et al. Handbook of Foreign Language Communication and Learning. Berlin: Hubert&co, 2009.
Koppenhaver, G.D. and Shrader, C.B. (2003). Structuring the Classrooms for Performance: Cooperative Learning with Instructor-Assigned Teams. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 1, 1, 1-21.
Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E. & Dochy, F. (2013). A metaanalysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133-149.
León del Barco, B., Mendo, S., Felipe, E., Fajardo, F., and Iglesias, D. (2018). Measuring responsibility and cooperation in learning teams in the university setting: validation of a questionnaire. Frontiers Psychology, 9:326.
Liu, T., and Lipowski, M. (2021). Influence of cooperative learning intervention on the intrinsic motivation of physical education students—a meta-analysis within a limited range. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18:2989.
Mendo, S., León, B., Felipe, E., Polo, M. I., and Iglesias, D. (2018). Cooperative team learning and the development of social skills in higher education: the variables involved. Frontiers Psychology, 9(1536).
Mendo-Lázaro, S., et al. (2022). The Impact of Cooperative Learning on University Students’ Academic Goals. Frontiers Psychology, 12(787210).
Nasri, M., & Biria, R. (2017). Integrating multiple and focused strategies for improving reading comprehension and l2 lexical development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(1), 311-321.
Ning H., & Hornby, G. (2010). The effectiveness of cooperative learning in teaching English to Chinese tertiary learners. Effective Education, 2(2), 99-116.
Qi Dou, A., Chan, S. H., and Win, M. T. (2023). Changing Visions in ESP Development and Teaching: Past, Present, and Future Vistas. Frontiers Psychology. 14(1140659).
Rychen, D. S. & Salganik L. H. (Eds.) (2001). Defining and Selecting Key Competences. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative Learning for Academic and Social gains: valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300-313.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 344-360). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Swales, J. Language for specific purposes, International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 2
Taqi, H. A., & Al-Nouh, N. A. (2014). Effect of group work on EFL students’ attitudes and learning in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 52-65.
Yager, R. E. (2000). The Constructivist Learning Model. The Science Teacher, 67(1), 44-45.
Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001).Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v9i1.1286
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email: journal.eltl@gmail.com
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Indexed and Abstracted BY:
