AI-Assisted Writing Tools and the Perceptions of Fairness in University Writing Courses and Assessments: An Analysis through Equity Theory

Hamid Issafi, Aziz Ouladhadda

Abstract


Nowadays, with the rapid breakthroughs in software and AI technology, the growing use of AI among university students has sparked considerable debate. In this context, the present research seeks to understand the impact of AI-assisted writing tools on students' perceptions of fairness, academic integrity, and their learning outcomes. An exploratory sequential design was used in this study, beginning with two focus groups to gather qualitative insights that informed the development of a 22-item survey. The survey was then administered to 107 students from the English departments at three institutions of Mohamed V University: FLSH, FSE, and ENS. The results indicate that AI use significantly affects students’ perceptions of fair assessment, with many viewing it as a tool that enhances work quality and academic grades. However, the use of AI is also associated with reduced motivation, lower willingness to invest effort, and diminished self-confidence. To address these challenges, participants suggested alternative assessment methods, including oral exams, tasks that emphasize critical thinking and creativity, and group work. By Analyzing these findings through the lens of Equity Theory and in light of existing research, this study offers insights into the evolving dynamics of fairness and academic integrity in the era of AI. It also offers recommendations for adapting assessment practices to maintain equity and integrity in higher education.

Keywords


Academic integrity; AI-assisted tools; Alternative assessment; Equity Theory; Perceived injustice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67(5), 422.

Aherrahrou, M. (2024, June). Assessing the English Language Lecturers' Skill in Identifying Originality in Essay Writing Among Moroccan S2 Students. In Conference Proceedings. The Future of Education 2024.

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2024). ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 845.

Astin, A. W. (1990). Educational assessment and educational equity. American Journal of Education, 98(4), 458-478.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Cohen, L. (2007). Manion. L., & Morrison, K.(2007). Research methods in education, 5.

Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02

Daife, Y., & Elharbaoui, E. (2025). Use of Artificial Intelligence by Students in Morocco: A Qualitative Study on Skills, Impact, and Perceptions. In Qualitative Approaches to Pedagogical Engineering (pp. 271-304). IGI Global.

Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management review, 12(1), 9-22.

Henning, G. W., Baker, G. R., Jankowski, N. A., Lundquist, A. E., & Montenegro, E. (Eds.). (2023). Reframing assessment to center equity: Theories, models, and practices. Taylor & Francis.

https://jurnal.kalimasadagroup.com/index.php/eduj/article/view/1084

Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010).The essence of research methodology: A concise guide for master and PhD students in management science. Springer Science & Business Media

Joyner, D. A. (2024). A Teacher’s Guide to Conversational AI: Enhancing Assessment, Instruction, and Curriculum with Chatbots. Taylor & Francis.

Khoudri, I., Zeriouh, M., Fauzan, U. M. A. R., & Khoudri, A. (2024). The use of ai in learning English: a comparative study between Moroccan and Indonesian undergraduate students from the English department. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 1271-1282.

Moussa, A., & Belhiah, H. (2024). Beyond Syntax: Exploring Moroccan Undergraduate EFL Learners’ Engagement with AI-Assisted Writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT.

Nurhaliza, N. (2024). An Analysis of Applications Employed by students to Cheat on Exams, English Educational Journal. Vol.2. N°1. ISSN : 3026-295X.

Parker, A., & Tritter, J. (2006). Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate.International Journal of Research & Method in Education,29(1), 23-37.

Rane, N. L., Paramesha, M., & Desai, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and the new cheating dilemma: Strategies for academic integrity. Artificial Intelligence and Industry in Society, 5, 2-2.

Roshanaei, M., Olivares, H., & Lopez, R. R. (2023). Harnessing AI to foster equity in education: Opportunities, challenges, and emerging strategies. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15(04), 123-143.

Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100259.

Vučković, D., Peković, S., Blečić, M., & Đoković, R. (2020). Attitudes towards cheating behavior during assessing students᾽ performance: student and teacher perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16, 1-28.

Wang, Y. M., Wei, C. L., Lin, H. H., Wang, S. C., & Wang, Y. S. (2024). What drives students’ AI learning behavior: A perspective of AI anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 2584-2600.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v9i3.1441

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email: journal.eltl@gmail.com


Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: