Men’s Language and Masculine Identity Construction in Sexist Jokes

Emi Nursanti

Abstract


The power imbalance between men and women in society is reflected in their language use and it may be reinforced in sexist jokes. This is a sociolinguistic study on men’s language in sexist jokes on the Internet. This study is aimed at investigating men’s linguistic features and the masculine identities represented by those features. This is a descriptive qualitative study with complementary quantitative analysis. The theories of Tannen’s men language (1990) and Kiesling’s masculine identities (2007) were used as references to analyze the data. The results show that men’s identity of competing for solidarity embodied in discourses of insults, teasing, and joking is the most dominant identity represented in sexist jokes. This is in line with the main intention of sexist humor to laugh at women’s inferiority. Meanwhile, men’s dominance realized in report talk becomes the second most prevalent identity. The identities of politeness oaf, indicated by direct command, and freedom, shown by swearing and taboo words, are not influential as both do not contribute to the making of humorous expressions. These imply that context and communication purposes motivate speakers to use gender-related features. Reflecting that most of the masculine identities and the language features in sexist jokes represent men’s superiority, this kind of humor can be a way to maintain gender asymmetry in society. Besides, although humor leads to laughter and is considered healthy, sexist humor is dangerous as the expressions subordinate women. Therefore, being critical when reading the jokes and trying to avoid such jokes in communication is suggested.

Keywords


men’s language; masculinities; sexist jokes; social dominance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrams, J., Bippus, A. & Mc.Gaughey, K. Gender disparaging jokes: An investigation of sexist-nonstereotypical jokes on funniness, typicality, and the moderating role of ingroup identification. HUMOR, 28(2). doi: 10.1515/humor-2015-0019

Baker, P. and Balirano, G. (2018). Queering Masculinities in Language and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan

Bemiller, M. & Schneider, R. (2010). IT'S NOT JUST A JOKE. Sociological Spectrum, 30(4), 459-479, DOI: 10.1080/02732171003641040

Bergmann, M. (1986). How many feminists does it take to make a joke? Sexist humour and what’s wrong with it. Hypatia 1 (1), pp. 63–82.

Brown, P. (1998) How and why are women more polite: some evidence from a Mayan community, pp. 81–99 in Coates, J. (ed.) Language and Gender: A Reader. Blackwell.

Cantor, J. R. (1976). What is Funny to Whom? Journal of Communication, 26(3), 164–172. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01920.x

Coates, J. 2013. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd Ed.). Routledge.

Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19 (6), pp. 829–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639.

Cowan, G., Drinkard, J. & MacGavin, L. (1984). The effects of target, age, and gender on use of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 1391–1398.

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community- Based Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155996

Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and Gender (2nd Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.

Fillmer, H.T., Haswell, L. (1977). Sex-role stereotyping in English usage. Sex Roles 3, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287614

Ford, T. (2000). Effects of Sexist Humor on Tolerance of Sexist Events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1094–1107.

Goffman E. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice-Hall

Goodwin, M. (1980) Directive-response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities, pp. 157–73 in McConnell-Ginet, et al. (eds) Women and Language in Literature and Society. Praeger.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. London.

Holmes, J. (2012). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th Edition). Routledge.

Hughes, G. (2006). An encyclopedia of swearing: The social history of oaths, profanity, foul language, and ethnic slurs in the English-speaking world. M. E. Sharpe.

Johnson, S. & Meinhof, U. (1997). Language and Masculinity. Blackwell

Kehily, M. & Nayak, A. (1997). “Lads and laughter”: Humour and the production of heterosexual hierarchies. Gender and Education 9(1), 69–88.

Kiesling, S. (2007). Men, Masculinities, and Language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 653–673. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00035.x

Kiesling, S. (2019). Language, Gender, and Sexuality: An introduction. Routledge.

Kroskrity, P. V. (2000). Identity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1-1), 111-114.

Labov, W. (1972). Rules for ritual insults, pp. 297–353. In Labov, W. (ed) Language in the Inner City. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Laineste, L. (2008). Politics of Joking: Ethnic Jokes and Their Targets in Estonia. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, 40, 117−146.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-79. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051

Lawson, R. (2020). Language and Masculinities: History, Development, and Future. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6(1), 409–434. doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011650

McCann, P., Plummer, D. & Minichiello, V. (2010). Being the butt of the joke: Homophobic humour, male identity, and its connection to emotional and physical violence for men. Health Sociology Review, 19(4), 505-521. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2010.19.4.505

Meyer, J. 2000. Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310-331. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x

Milani, T. (2015). Theorizing language and masculinities. In Milani, T. (ed.) Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations. Routledge.

Nasreen, Z. (2021). ‘Have You Not Got a Sense of Humour?’: Unpacking Masculinity through Online Sexist Jokes during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Society and Culture in South Asia, 7(1) 148–154. doi: 10.1177/2393861720977632

Pasaribu, T. & Kadarisman, A. (2016). Coding logical mechanism and stereotyping in gender cyber humours. A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature 16, 22-48. doi:10.24167/celt.v16i1.485

Pearson, J. & VanHorn, S. (2004) Communication and gender identity: A retrospective analysis, Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 284-299. doi:10.1080/01463370409370198

Plester, B. (2015). ‘Take it like a man!’: Performing hegemonic masculinity through organizational humour. Ephemera: theory and politics in organization, 15(3): 537-559.

Pound, L. (2008). Jokes are No Laughing Matter: Disparagement Humor and Social Identity Theory. Master’s Thesis. University of Kansas.

Schwarz, J. (2010). Linguistic Aspects of Verbal Humor in Stand-up Comedy. Dissertation. Universität des Saarlandes.

Stapleton, K. (2010). Swearing. In Locher, M. & Graham, S. (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 289–306. doi:10.1515/9783110214338.2.289

Talbot, M. (2019). Language and Gender (3rd Ed.). Polity Press.

Tannen,D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. William Morrow & Co.,

Thomae, M, & Pina, A. (2015). Sexist humour and social identity: The role of sexist humour in men’s in-group cohesion, sexual harassment, rape proclivity, and victim blame. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 28 (2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1515/humour-2015-0023

Trudgill, P. (2000) Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society (4th Ed.). Penguin Books.

Turner, J., Oakes, P., Haslam, S., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463. doi:10.1177/0146167294205002

Wardhaugh, R. & Fuller, J. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th Ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

West, C. (1998) Not just ‘doctors’ orders’: directive–response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians, pp. 328–53 in Coates, J. (ed.) Language and Gender: A Reader. Blackwell.

Wilkins, J. & Eisenbraun, A. (2009). Humor theories and the physiological benefits of laughter. Holistic Nursing Practice. 349-354

Wolff, S., & Puts, D. (2010). Vocal masculinity is a robust dominance signal in men. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(10), 1673–1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0981-5




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i2.818

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email: journal.eltl@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: