A Comparative Study of American and Moroccan University Students’ Perception of Academic Writing

Nadia Hellalet

Abstract


The study attempts to investigate native speakers’ and non-native speakers’ perceptions of writing quality. Thirty-seven American freshmen students and forty Moroccan semester two students participated in the study. An email interview was used to explore the similarities and differences between the students’ views on what makes good academic writing. Both American and Moroccan Students were asked about the different features of academic writing that can contribute to its quality. The research findings revealed that most of the American students focused on the content of the paper. They stated that it should be exciting and engaging. It should also have depth and grab the reader’s attention. Many of them mentioned the reader in their responses. They noted that writing should be easy to read and respond to the readers’ expectations. On the other hand, Moroccan students focused on the form of paper, including language and conventions. They put correct grammar and vocabulary on top of their list. Good writing style, good sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, simple language, and coordination are necessary elements. The study has pedagogical implications that can benefit writing teachers.

Keywords


academic writing, English native speakers, non-native speakers, perceptions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benda, J. (1999). Qualitative studies in contrastive rhetoric: An analysis of composition research. Retrieved August 1st, 2021, from http://web.thu.edu.tw/benda/www/methcomm.htm

Connor, U. (2002). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (4), 493–510.

Derakhshan, A. & Karimain Shirejini, R. (2020). An investigation of the Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions towards the most common writing problems. Sage Open, 10(2), 1-10.

Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Hyland, K. (2002). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 115130). Longman.

Ismail, S.A.A. (2010). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ESL Writing. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 73-83.

Jordan, R. R. (1997). Identification of problems and needs: A student project. In A.P. Cowie & J.B. Heaton (Eds.), English for Academic Purposes (67-89). University of Reading.

Kaplan, R.B. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (9-23) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Liebman, J. D. (1992). Toward a new contrastive rhetoric: differences between Arabic and Japanese rhetorical instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 141-165.

Matsuda, P. K. (2001). On the origin of contrastive rhetoric: A response to H.G. Ying. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 257–260.

McKay, S. (1979). Communicative writing. TESOL Quarterly,13(1), 73-80

Ouaouicha, D. (1986). Contrastive rhetoric and the structure of the learner-produced argumentative texts in Arabic (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Texas, Austin.

Overmeyer, M. (2009). What student writing teaches us: Formative assessment in the writing workshop. Stenhouse Publishers.

Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Silber, P. (1979). Teaching written English as a second language. College Composition and Communication, 30(3), 296-300.

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL Research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677.

Zamel, V. (1976). Teaching Composition in the ESL Classroom: What We Can Learn from Research in the Teaching of English. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 67-76




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i3.654

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email:journal.eltl@gmail.com


Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: