Exploring the Interplay of Metacognitive Awareness and Reading Proficiency: A Study among Moroccan University EFL Students

El Mehdi El Madani, Mohammed Larouz, Mustapha Fagroud, Zayneb Saadallah, Jamal Barebzi

Abstract


In recent years, there has been a considerable interest in metacognition and language learning research. An ever-increasing body of literature shares the consensus that metacognitive knowledge plays a critical role in the process of language learning. While metacognitive knowledge encapsulates being cognizant of one’s own language level and the learning strategies available to improve this level, the absence of such an awareness brings about serious challenges that hinder the process of language learning. In light of such a hiatus, the present study attempts to examine the relationship between EFL university students’ reading proficiency in English and their metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. In order to achieve this objective, Data were collected using three language proficiency tests in reading and Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI). 94 third-year university students enrolled in the Department of English Studies at the School of Arts and Humanities in Meknes formed the sample of this investigation. With reference to data analysis, the study employed Pearson product-moment correlation and Simple Linear Regression as statistical tools to analyze the generated data. The findings of the investigated relationship showed that there was a strong positive correlation between participants’ English reading proficiency and their reading metacognitive awareness, with a r-value of 0.810. It was also revealed reading metacognitive awareness predicted 65% of reading comprehension ability. Finally, the findings of the present study have brought about crucial contributions, in terms of both theory and practice, to the existing body of literature on metacognition and language learning. The results of this endeavour have also triggered various pedagogical and methodological implications and recommendations for language teachers, syllabus designers, higher education departments of English studies, and future research.

Keywords


Language Learning, Metacognition, Reading, Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Ali, Z. K., Bashar, A., & Khonamri, F. (2023). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on Reading Comprehension among the Iraqi Female Students. Res Militaris, 13(1), 768-782.

Alderson, J. C., & Urquhart, A. H. (1985). The effect of students' academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests. Language Testing, 2(2), 192-204.

Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2020). Investigating Metacognitive Think-Aloud Strategy in Improving Saudi EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension and Attitudes. English Language Teaching, 13(9), 50-62.

Anderson, N. J. (2012). Metacognition: Awareness of language learning. In Psychology for language learning (pp. 169-187). Palgrave Macmillan

Baker, L. (2005). Developmental differences in metacognitive knowledge: Implications for metacognitively oriented reading instruction. In E. Israel, C. Block, L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 61–79). Routledge.

Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 353–394). Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Addison Wesley Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.

Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education.

Cartwright, K. B. (2015). Executive skills and reading comprehension: A guide for educators. Guilford Publications.

Creswell, J. Clark (2007). Research design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Methods Approaches.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Demont, E., &Gombert, J. E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of recoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British journal of educational psychology, 66(3), 315-332.

Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational psychologist, 46(1), 6-25.

El Madani, E., & Larouz, M. (2020). An Investigation into the relationship between French and English reading abilities: freshmen students of the English Department at Meknes as a case study. International Journal of Advance Study and Research Work, 3(5), 30-48.

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141-172.

Field, J. (1999). Bottom Up and Top Down: Key Concepts, ELT) ELTJ 54/2.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. The nature of intelligence.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Monitoring social cognitive enterprises: Something else that may develop in the area of social cognition. Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures, 11, 272-287.

Gaux, C., &Gombert, J. E. (1999). Implicit and explicit syntactic knowledge and reading in pre‐adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(2), 169-188.

Goldman, S. R., Golden, R., & van den Broek, P. (2007). Why are computational models of text comprehension useful? Higher-level language processes in the brain, 27-51.

Goodman, K. (1988). The reading process. Interactive approaches to second language reading, 6.

Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Literacy Research and Instruction, 6(4), 126-135.

Gough, P. B., &Cosky, M. J. (1977). One second of reading again. Cognitive theory, 2, 271-288.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.

Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst KlettSprachen.

Grabe, W., &Stoller, F. (1997). Reading and vocabulary development in a second language: A case study. Second language vocabulary acquisition, 98-122.

Grabe, W., &Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and research reading. Longman.

Guo, L. (2018). Modelling the relationship of metacognitive knowledge, L1 reading ability, L2 language proficiency and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(2).

Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437.

Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. SAGE Open, 12(4), 21582440221138069.

Kintsch, W., & Walter Kintsch, C. B. E. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Larouz, M. (2004). Relationship between reading achievement and writing ability among Moroccan university students. Ph.D. Thesis. School of Arts and Humanities Dhar el Mehraz, Fes.

Larouz, M. (2012). Reading and writing ability in descriptive & argumentative discourse: Moroccan university students as a case study. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

Long, D. L., Johns, C. L., & Morris, P. E. (2006). Comprehension ability in mature readers. In Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 801-833). Academic Press.

Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition?. Phi delta kappan, 87(9), 696-699.

Miller, G. A. (1999). On knowing a word. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 1-19.

Mokhtari, K., &Reichard, C. (2004). Investigating the strategic reading processes of first and second language readers in two different cultural contexts. SYSTEM, 32(3), 379-394.

Mokhtari, K., &Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 249.

Oakhill, J. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less skilled comprehenders' memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 13-20.

Oakhill, J. V., Hartt, J., &Samols, D. (1996, August). Comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. In 14th Biennial ISSBD Conference, Quebec City.

Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., &Parkin, A. (1986). On the nature of the difference between skilled and less‐skilled comprehenders. Journal of research in reading, 9(2), 80-91.

O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner‐Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language learning, 35(1), 21-46.

O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.

O'Malley, J. M., O'Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies What every teacher should know. Heinle & heinle Publishers.

Oxford, R. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (166–172). Cambridge University Press.

Paris, S.G.,&Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Erlbaum.

Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific studies of reading, 11(4), 357-383.

Perfetti, C. A. (1984). Reading acquisition and beyond: Decoding includes cognition. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 40-60.

Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford University Press.

Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. The neurocognition of language, 167, 208.

Perfetti, C. A., & Britt, M. A. (1995). Where do propositions come from. Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch, 11-34.

Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. The science of reading: A handbook, 227-247.

Perfetti, C. A., Van Dyke, J., & Hart, L. (2001). The psycholinguistics of basic literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 127-149.

Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2009). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. Journal of Education, 189(1-2), 77-94.

Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 273-295.

Rawson, K. A., &Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on the time of the test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 70.

Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (1989).The Psychology of Reading. Prentice Hall.

Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton Jr, C. (2012). Psychology of reading. Psychology Press.

Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Ridley, D.S., Schutz, P.A., Glanz, R.S., and Weinstein, C.E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 293-306.

Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 32-71.

Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. Guilford Press.

Tunmer, W. E., & Hoover, W. A. (1992). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. Reading acquisition, 175.

Urquhart, A. H. Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skills. The science of reading: A handbook, 227-247. & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Routledge.

Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Routledge.

Zhang, L. J., & Seepho, S. (2020). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance: A comparative study of secondary school students. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 255-267.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v9i2.1322

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email: journal.eltl@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: