The Relevance of the Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Approaches to Promote Interaction in EFL Classroom

Theophile Muhayimana

Abstract


This paper that is a theoretical inquiry by design aimed at analyzing the importance and implications of the Vygotskian sociocultural approaches (VSA) on teaching and learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Scholarship indicated that EFL learners’ problems are tightly linked to the class culture that oftentimes involves teacher-centered instruction, rote learning, and restricted learner’s involvement and self-motivation in the learning process. It is the premise of this paper that revisiting the class culture and use the VSA will contribute a great deal to addressing some of communication and classroom interaction issues in EFL context. First, at the onset, the paper discussed the relevance of the framework to the teaching and learning of EFL. Second, the study delved into the literature that reviewed the four fundamental components of the framework that are tightly related to promoting language learning and classroom interaction. These concepts include social environment and use of tools vis-à-vis the learning and development process, scaffolding, and the notion of the zone of proximal development. Third, the paper looked into the implications of the VSA on enhancing interaction in EFL classroom that focused on knowledge about learners to better assist them, promotion of classroom discourse, and collaborative learning environment. Fourth, the conclusion underscored the paramount importance of the collaborative learning environment to sustain classroom interaction; that ending section also shed light on the limitations of the VSA and strategies to alleviate them.


Keywords


Classroom interaction, collaborative learning, EFL, semiotic mediation, zone of proximal development.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abate, E.B. (2014). Prospects and challenges of communicative approach in EFL. Research on

Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(25), 128-136.

Andrew, M. D., Cobb, C. D., & Giampietro, P. J. (2005). Verbal ability and teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 343-354.

Asl, E.H. (2015). Comparative study of grammar translation method (GTM) and communicative language teaching (CLT) in language teaching methodology. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 1 (3), 16-25.

Behroozizad, S., Namibia, R.M.K., & Amir, Z. (2014). Sociocultural theory as an approach to aid EFL learners. The Reading Matrix 14(2), 217-226.

Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding in STEM education. Strategies and efficacy evidence. New York, NY: Springer Cham Heidelberg.

Brown, H.D. (2007). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.

Chen, Z., & Goh, C. C. (2011). Teaching oral English in higher education: Challenges to EFL teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(3), 333-345.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.609281

Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.

Dresser, R. (2012). The impact of scripted literacy instruction on teachers and students. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 71-87.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72.

Eun, B. & Lim, H.S. (2009). A sociocultural view of language learning: The importance of meaning-based instruction. TESL CANADA JOURNAL/REVUE TESL DU CANADA, 27 (1), 13-26.

Farrell, T.S.C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. New York, NY: Continuum.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group.

Friedmann, N. & Rusou, D. (2015). Critical period for first language: The crucial role of language input during the first year of life. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 35, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.06.003

Gebhard, J.G. (2005). Teaching English as a foreign or second language. A teacher self-development and methodology guide. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247-273.

Harland, T. (2003). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and problem-based learning: linking a theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 263–272.

Haider, M. &Yasmin, A. (2015). Significance of scaffolding and peer tutoring in the light of Vygotsky’s theory of zone of proximal development. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1( 3), 2015.

Huang, H.M.( 2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27-37.

Ibrahim, M. E. H. (2012).Classroom Interaction in Second Language Teaching and Learning in the Vocational Education Development Centre (VEDC). (Unpublished masters’ thesis). British University in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Lange, C., Costley, J., & Han, S.L. (2016). Informal cooperative learning in small groups: The effect of scaffolding on participation. Issues in Educational Research, 26(2), 260-279.

Kessler, C. (Ed.). (1992). Cooperative language learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Khaliliaqdam, S. (2014). ZPD, scaffolding and basic speech development in EFL context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 891 – 897.

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.497

Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, S.A. Vladimir & M.M. Suzanne (Eds), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. (pp. 1-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kumuravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a post method pedagogy.TESOL QUATERLY, 35 (4), 537-560.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods. Macro strategies for language teaching. Connecticut: Yale University Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching. From method to post method. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lee, J.S. & Bucholtz, M. (2015). Language socialization across learning spaces (pp. 319-336). In

N. Markee (Ed.), The Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 319-336). Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.

Lee, M.S. (2015). Implementing the sociocultural theory while teaching ESL. SPACE: Student

Perspectives About Civic Engagement, 1(1), 28-35.

Lin, L. (2016). Investigating Chinese HE EFL Classrooms: Using collaborative learning to enhance learning. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Lindblom, J. &Ziemke, T. (2002). Social situatedness: Vygotsky and beyond. Lund University Cognitive Studies 94, 71-78.

Lourenço, O. (2012). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial difference. New

Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281-295.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006

Mahn, L. (2012). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational psychologist, 31(3/4), 191-206.

Mart, C. T. (2013).The grammar-translation method and the use of translation to facilitate learning in ESL classes. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 1(4), 103-105.

Nawrot, E. (2014). “Victor or the wild boy” as a teaching tool for the history of psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 41(3), 237-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314537977

Nordquist, R. (2017. English as a foreign language (EFL). Thought Co. https://www.thoughtco.com/english-as-a-foreign-language-efl-1690597.

Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Parsell, G. (2000). Asking questions-improving teaching. Medical Education, 34, 592–593.

doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00750.x

Piaget. J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. An essay on the relations between organic regulation and cognitive process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Poehner, M. E., & Infante, P. (2016). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/tesq.308

Rahman, F.A., Scaife, J., Yahya, N.A., &Jalil, H.A. (2010). Knowledge of diverse learners: Implications for the practice of teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 3(2), 83-96.

Razak, N.A., Saeed, M., & Ahmad, Z. (2013). Adopting social networking sites (SNSs) as interactive communities among English Foreign Language (EFL) learners in writing: opportunities and challenges. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 187-198. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n11p187

Regan ,C. N. (2016). The future of human nature and social progress. A case for Optimism in an age of despair. (Unpublished maters’ thesis). BallStateUniversity, United States of America. Retrieved from http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/200643/A378_2016ReganCoreyN-opt.pdf?sequence=

Rezaee, A.A., Azizi, Z. (2012). The role of zone of proximal development in the students’ learning of English adverbs. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 51-57.

Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Ritt, M. (2016). The impact of high-stakes testing on the learning environment. (Unpublished masters’ thesis). St. Catherine University/University of St. Thomas, United States of America.

Roorda, K. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., &Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of teacher-student relationships on student's school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529.

Rule, P. N. (2015). Dialogue and boundary learning. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.

Samana, W. (2013). Teacher’s and students’ scaffolding in an EFL classroom. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 338-343.

Sang, Y. (2017). A conceptual review of age effect on L2 acquisition. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 1-4.

Shaban, K. (2016a). Implications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory for second language (L2) assessment. Cogent education, 3, (1), 1-10.

Shaban, K. (2016b). Applications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach for teachers’ professional development. Cogent education, 3, 1-10.

Shaban, K., Khatib, M., &Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English Language Teaching 3(4), 237-248.

Skidmore, D., Perez-Parent, M., &Arnfielf, S. (2003).Teacher-pupil dialogue in the guided reading session. Reading: Literacy and Language, 37(2), 47-53.

Styron, J.L & Strayon, R.A. (2012). Teaching to the test: A controversial issue in quantitative measurement. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 10(5), 22-25.

Sullivan, P., Smith, M., &Matusov, E. (2009).Bakhtin, Socrates and the carnivalesque in education. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 326-342.

doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.12.001

Tsang, A. (2017). EFL/ESL teachers’ general language proficiency and learners’ engagement.

RELC Journal, 48(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690060

Turk, M.C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the second language classroom. ARECLS, 5, 244-262.

Vygotsky, L.S., (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1998). Collected works. Child psychology. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Vygotsky, L.S., (1999). Educational psychology. N.W. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC

Verenikina, I. (2010). Vygotsky in Twenty-First-Century research. In J. Herrington & B. Hunter (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 16-25). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Verg, L. &Kotz, S.A. (2013).How relevant is social interaction in second language learning?

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1-7.

Doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00550

Wells, G. (1994). The complementary contributions of Holliday and Vygotsky to a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 6, 41-90.

Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wood, D. (1992). ‘Teaching Talk: How modes of teacher talk affect pupil participation’ in K. Norman, Thinking Voices: The work of the national oracy project (pp. 203-214). London: Holder & Stoughton.

Wood, J., Bruner J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.

Xia, Y. (2014). Language theories and language teaching—from traditional grammar to functionalism. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 559-565.

Xuesong, G.A. (2006). Understanding Chinese students’ teacher dependence (China). In T.S.C. Farrel (Ed.), Language teacher research in Asia. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL.

Zhang, Y. (2008). Classroom discourse and student learning. Asian Social Science 4(9), 80-83.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v2i3.85

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email:journal.eltl@gmail.com


Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: