An Ecological Perspective on Reading Development: a Theoretical Framework to Guide Empirical Research

Neirouz Nadori

Abstract


Recent efforts have addressed the new challenges related to conceptualizing, understanding and improving reading competency. Several literacy researchers have perceived reading as a developmental skill that is not situated exclusively within student’s cognition, or within family processes, or within classroom or school processes. Rather, reading development has been viewed as a result of the dynamic interaction among reader, family, classroom, and school system (Jaeger, 2017). Following on from this, systems theory approach and more specifically the ecological model allows for the examination of reading skill development from a holistic perspective. It provides an inclusive frame for describing and explaining how the educational opportunities are distributed at the micro, meso, exo, and macro systems and how these systems interact to explain students’ reading differences amon. It also delineates how developing readers’ individual characteristics transact with both proximal and distal processes to craft their reading ecologies. Future policy, practice and research are recommended to be based on the ecological model premises to have a comprehensive view of reading development.


Keywords


Systems theory approach, ecological model, and reading skill development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R. C. (1978). Schema-directed processes in language comprehension. Cognitive

Psychology and Instruction (pp. 67-82). Springer, Boston, MA.

Aikens, N. L., &Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The

contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 100(2), 235.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P.A. (1998). The bioecological model of human development.In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R.M. Lerner (Vol Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1 Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993-1027). New York, NY: John Riley & Sons

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical finding.Socilal development, 9(1), 115-125.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (2004). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives onhuman development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development.Handbook of Child Psychology.

Cheung, D., & Lai, E. (2013). The effects of classroom teaching on students' self-efficacy for

personal development. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 41(2), 164-177.

Cheung, D. (2015). The combined effects of classroom teaching and learning strategy use on students’ chemistry self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 101-116.

Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W. Y. (2015). Classmate characteristics and student achievement in33 countries: Classmates’ past achievement, family socioeconomic status, educational resources, and attitudes toward reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 152.

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D.,& Robert, L. (1966). York. Equality of educational opportunity, 2.

Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Routledge.

Farrant, B. M., & Zubrick, S. R. (2012). Early vocabulary development: The importance of joint attention and parent-child book reading. First Language, 32(3), 343-364.

Goodman, K. S. (1965). A linguistic study of cues and miscues in reading. Elementary English, 42(6), 639-643.

Hawkins, J. L. (2017). "Figuring It Out": A Qualitative Case Study Exploring the Development of Novice, Alternatively Certified Special Educators in Oklahoma (Doctoral dissertation). Nothwestern Oklahoma University, Oklahoma, USA.

Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2018). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts. Routledge.

Jaeger, E. L. (2012). Understanding and Supporting Vulnerable Readers: A Ecological Systems Perspective (Doctoral dissertation). California University, Berkely, USA .

Jaeger, E. L. (2017). Negotiating complexity: A bioecological systems perspective on literacy development. Human Development, 59(4), 163-187.

Lerner, R. M., & Overton, W. F. (2008). Exemplifying the integrations of the relational developmental system: Synthesizing theory, research, and application to promote positive development and social justice. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(3), 245-255.

Magnusson, D., & Cairns, R. B. (1996). Developmental science: Toward a unified framework. Cambridge University Press.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., & Hooper, M. (2017). Methods and procedures in PIRLS 2016. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

Nadori, N. (2020), Reading comprehension achievement: A comparative study of Moroccan public and private high schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida, Morocco.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume

III) : What School Life Means for Students’ Lives, PISA, Éditions OCDE,

Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en.

Overton, W. F. (2013). A new paradigm for developmental science: Relationism and relational-developmental systems. Applied Developmental Science, 17(2), 94-107.

Sadoski, M. (2018). Reading comprehension is embodied: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 331-349.

Shute, R. H., & Slee, P. T. (2015). Child development: Theories and critical perspectives. Routledge.

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabledchildren: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. Psychological and Educational Perspectives on Learning Disabilities, 87-131.

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. Handbook of Child Psychology.

Unrau, N. J., Rueda, R., Son, E., Polanin, J. R., Lundeen, R. J., &Muraszewski, A. K. (2018). Can reading self-efficacy be modified? A meta-analysis of the impact of interventions on reading self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 167-204.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher mental processes.Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Zimmerman, B. J., &Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. ContemporaryEducational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i2.397

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email:[email protected]


Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: