Student-Teachers’ Engagement in Mediated Writing Feedback: Narrative Inquiry

Muhammad Reza Pahlevi

Abstract


Advance of technology brings about different ways in language learning and teaching. Indeed, mediated writing feedback has been adopted and demanded in language assessment. However, little is known on how students’ engagement in mediated writing feedback. This present study explores students’ engagement in mediated writing feedback. Narrative inquiry design was used to reveal students’ experience and reflection of mediated writing feedback. Three student-teachers involved in this study. They assigned as they meet requirement in this study. They were in thesis writing. Semi-structured interview used to reveal students’ learning experience in receiving mediated writing feedback. Students’ writing work used in this study as well. The obtained data were analyzed by thematic analysis. They also interpreted by theories lenses. The findings illustrated that mediated writing feedback stimulates students learn to write actively (behavior engagement), assists students learn to write (cognitive engagement), and have a balance emotion (emotional engagement.)

Keywords


mediated writing feedback, students’ engagement, student-teachers, narrative inquiry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007), Teaching for Quality Learning at University What the Student Does, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead, Blacklick.

Braine, George. (2004). Teaching second and foreign language writing on local area networks (LANs). In Sandra Fotos & Charles M. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 93–108). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3. 77-101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. San Francisco California: Pearson Education.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Clandinin, D. J., & Rosiek, J. (2007). Mapping the landscape of narrative inquiry:Borderlands spaces and tensions. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 35–76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cumming, A., & Berwick, R. (1996). Validation in Language Testing (Modern Languages in Practice: 2). Adelaide: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.

DiGiovanni, Elaine, &Nagaswami, Girija. (2001). Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face? ELTJournal, 53, 263–272.

Golladay, R.M.; Prybutok, V.R.; Huff, R.A. Critical success factors for the online learner. J. Comp. Inform. Syst. 2000, 40, 69–71.

Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002

Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Alvarez, I. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835772

Hickson, Hellen. 2016. Critical reflection: reflecting on learning to be reflective. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net.

Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2019). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005

Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985

Mayer, Richard E. (2008). Learning and instruction. United State of America: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Morgan, V. L., & Toledo, C. A. (2006). Online Feedback and Student Perceptions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning Www.Ncolr.Org/Jiol, 5(3). www.ncolr.org/jiol

Oxford Brookes University. (2016). Reflective journal. Retrieved from http://www.brookes.ac.uk.

Kopriva, Rebecca. (2008). Improving testing for English language learners. New York: Routledge.

Vayre, E., & Von-thron, A. M. (2017). Psychological Engagement of Students in Distance and Online Learning: Effects of Self-Efficacy and Psychosocial Processes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656849

Stödberg, U. (2011), “A research review of e-assessment”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 591-604.

Sullivan, Nancy, &Pratt, Ellen. (1996). Acomparative study oftwoESL writing environments:Acomputer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 24, 491–501.

Tuckman, B.W. (1975). Measuring educational outcomes (fundamentals of testing). San Fracisco:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161–1174.

Yang, Y.-F. (2010). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students’ writing. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x.

Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002

Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Alvarez, I. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835772

Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2019). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005

Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985

Morgan, V. L., & Toledo, C. A. (2006). Online Feedback and Student Perceptions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning Www.Ncolr.Org/Jiol, 5(3). www.ncolr.org/jiol

Ramdani, J.,& Widodo, H. (2019). Student teachers' engagement in facebook-assisted peer assessment in an initial teacher education context: speaking 2.0. Journal of Education for Teaching. http://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1599503.

Vayre, E., & Vonthron, A. M. (2017). Psychological Engagement of Students in Distance and Online Learning: Effects of Self-Efficacy and Psychosocial Processes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656849

Yanto, E. S., & Pravitasari, H. (2020). Experiences In The Indonesian ESP Classroom Context A Narrative Inquiry Of Student Teachers Multimodal Practice Experiences In The Indonesian ESP Classroom Context. 12–20.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i3.439

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email:[email protected]

Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: