Comparison of Commissive Acts between University of Oxford’s and Universitas Indonesia’s Prospectuses

Fajriyati Waibah Mosambonga, Issy Yuliasri, Abdurrachman Faridi

Abstract


This study aimed to compare Oxford University (OU) as a native English speaker and Universitas Indonesia (UI) as a non-native English speaker in presenting commissive acts in their university prospectus to see their similarities and differences. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. The data were an English-written prospectus from OU, The World's Best University and UI, The Best Indonesian University in 2020, based on the 2020 World University Rankings by Times Higher Education (THE). Specifically, data were taken only from forty-nine courses in Undergraduate Programs from each prospectus. Data were analyzed using six types of commissive acts instruments according to Searle, (1976), namely Promise, Threaten, Guarantee, Refuse, Volunteer, and Offer supported with (IFIDs) and Felicity Conditions. Data were analyzed by identifying the types of commissive acts, classifying, comparing, interpreting, and concluding. This study found four similarities; both only presented three types of commissive acts such as Promise, Offer, and Guarantee. Both dominant presented the Guarantee type. Both tend to present commissive acts implicitly. For Promise and Guarantee, both do not present them explicitly. Three differences were; OU presented more commissive acts (312), while UI only (193). On the Promise type, OU tends to address its readers using (you), while UI used (students). On the Offer type, OU only presented it explicitly (27) times, while UI did it explicitly (17) and implicitly (3) times. The results of this study are expected to provide additional information regarding the proper use of commissive acts to attract readers' interest.

Keywords


advertisement; commissive act; native and non-native English speaker; speech act; university prospectus

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afzaal, A. (2022). Identification of speech acts: A linguistic analysis of advertisements in Pakistan. Journal of English Language Literature and Education, 3(3), 1–14. http://jelle.lgu.edu.pk/index.php/jelle/article/view/98

Anam, I. (2022). An analysis of linguistic strategies in personal public apologies of Pakistani media figures. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(2), 271–283. http://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-II)23

Arshad, A., & Shakir, A. (2014). Corpus based study of private and public verbs in online university prospectus. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(25), 24–29. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234674231.pdf

Astriningsih, N., Setiawan, W. A., & Bram, B. (2020). Written speech acts found in advertisements on Indonesian online news websites. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v7i1.9545

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

Bano, Z., & Shakir, A. (2015). Personal pronouns in ‘ About Us ’ section of online university prospectus. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 133–140. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083772

Basra, S., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i1.6848%0A%0A

Cui, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2014). The use of second-person reference in advertisement translation with reference to translation between Chinese and English. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 2(1), 25–36. http://www.ijscl.net/article_3188_6a022829259d833fc4a7129910ea4a0f.pdf

Dewi, D. (2019). Illocutionary acts of environmental persuasion in U.S. online newspaper opinion articles. Beyond Words, 7(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v7i2.2151

Firdaus, S. F., Indrayani, L. M., & Soemantri, Y. S. (2020). Analysis of Jokowi’s commissive speech acts in 2014 and 2019 inaugural address: A pragmatic study. Teknosastik, 18(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v18i2.676

Fitriani, S. S., Achmad, D., & Rasmita, F. (2020). An analysis of illocutionary acts in a fantasy movie. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.13635

Hong, C. C., & Ahmad, U. K. (2014). Language of promotion in Malaysian banking brochures. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 20(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2014-2003-11

Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics a Coursebook (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hutajulu, F. S. L., & Herman, H. (2019). Analysis of illocutionary act in the movie “You Are My Home” English subtitle. JEES: Journal of English Educational Study, 2(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v2i1.371

Ilić, B.M., & Radulović, M. (2015). Commissive and expressive illocutionary acts in political discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 11(1), 19–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2015-0003

Kfouri, C. (2020). Analyzing speech acts in Lebanese Arabic, French and English beer Advertisements: A cross cultural study of speech acts. Linguistica Online, 23. http://www.phil.muni.cz/linguistica/art/kfouri/kfo-001.pdf

Kharazyan, H., & Tatsioka, Z. (2019). Pragmatic-linguistic aspects of WWF PSAs on nature protection. 23rd International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 23, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.26262/istal.v23i0.7345

Macarthur, J., Eaton, M., & Mattick, K. (2019). Every picture tells a story: Content analysis of medical school website and prospectus images in the United Kingdom. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(4), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00528-5

Mu’man, M. (2020). Communicative illocutionary act on students’ conversation video in one of the English courses in Bandung. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 3(2), 305. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v3i2.p305-310

Mukhroji, M., Nurkamto, J., Subroto, H. D. E., & Tarjana, S. S. (2019). Pragmatic forces in the speech acts of EFL speakers at Kampung Inggris, Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(1), 38–60. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsser/issue/45447/570402

Mulatsih, D., Nur, T., Indrayani, L.M., & Darmayanti, N. (2021). Politeness strategy in comissive speech acts. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4(2), 2021. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v4i2.11823

Nabila, Z., Mujiyanto, J., & Rukmini, D. (2021). The comparison of commisive speech acts by Trump and Warren presidential candidate viewed from gender differences. English Education Journal, 11(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v11i1.41899

Nugroho, A., & Rekha, A. (2020). Speech acts of requests: A case of Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(1), 1–16. www.jeltl.org

Oke, F. B., & Olajimbiti, E. O. (2021). The pragmatics of promotional features and discourse strategies in postgraduate school prospectus in nigeria. Crossroads: A Journal of English Studies, 32, 4–15. https://doi.org/10.15290/CR.2021.32.1.01

Perdana, R. R., Bharati, D. A. L., & Yuliasri, I. (2021). Realization of assertive speech acts performed by The National University Debating Championship Grand Final 2020. English Education Journal, 10(4), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v10i4.48119

Raheem, B.R., & Nehal, R. (2021). A pragmatic study of speech acts pertaining to health advice in Covid-19 pandemic. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 9(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v9i1.19137

Rustam, R., & Bacha, M. S. (2021). Decoding the wordplay: Speech act analysis of headlines predicting the future. Journal of Peace, Development and Communication, 5(1), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.36968/JPDC

Salama, A. H. Y. (2021). Footing and speech acts in the Qur’anic dialogue of Allah and Iblis: A pragmatically enhanced approach. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 21(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.33806/IJAES2000.21.2.5

Saputri, N. I., Hidayat, D. N., Alek, A., & Eviyuliwati, I. (2021). An Analysis of illocutionary acts in beauty product advertisements in television broadcast. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 1–11. https://jeltl.org/index.php/jeltl/article/view/483

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Act; an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166848

Simon, S., & Dejica-Cartis, D. (2015). Speech acts in written advertisements: Identification, classification and analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.033

Slabu, L., Lenton, A. P., Sedikides, C., & Bruder, M. (2014). Trait and state authenticity across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(9), 1347–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114543520

Strizhkova, O. V., Kabanova, O. V., Shcherbakova, M. V., Terekhova, G. V., & Mokrickaya, E. A. (2018). The main features of speech acts usage in food advertising discourse. Espacios, 39(36). https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n36/a18v39n36p11.pdf

Sukarini, N. W. (2022). Speech acts in written advertisements. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 714–723. doi: 10.52462/jlls.214

Thomas, J. (2013). Meaning in Interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics. Routledge.

Tian, Y. (2020). ‘ History ’ s silent ?’: The self-advertising of Chinese universities. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines Journal, 12(1), 1-19. https:// www. lancaster. ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Vol12.1-1- Tian.pdf

Virdis, D. F. (2021). Stereotyping Scotland: Groundskeeper Willie’s illocutionary acts in The Simpsons. Crossroads: A Journal of English Studies, 32(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.15290/CR.2021.32.1.02

Vlasenko, N. I., & Naumov, E. V. (2022). Functioning of the speech act commissive in various situations. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 1(29), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2022.29.1.3

Xie, C., & Teo, P. (2020). Tuning up the promotional volume: Comparing the About Us texts of top- and second-tier universities in China and America. Journal of Pragmatics, 159, 60–72. http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j. pragma.2020.01.010

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yuliarti, I., Mujiyanto, J., & Saleh, M. (2021). The fulfillment of felicity conditions in speech acts in Winfrey’s speech Learn from Every Mistake. English Education Journal, 11(4), 606–515. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v11i1.48795




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i2.863

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email: journal.eltl@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: