Fostering Students’ Reading Comprehension Ability through Directed Reading Thinking Activities (DRTA) Strategy

Yuni Putri Utami, Sugirin Sugirin

Abstract


The current curriculum school reform in Indonesia supported the students to be a critical thinker in the sense that the students become a centered of teaching instruction in the school life. This changing becomes a new demand for the teacher as an educator to facilitate their learners with teaching aids practices that adjust learners to be actively participate in the classroom. Thus, this study used Directed Reading Thinking Activities (DRTA) to reveal the effectiveness of this strategy on the students’ reading comprehension teaching. A quasi-experimental research design with pretest and posttest was used in this study. Two classes were randomly selected as the sample of this research. They are class 8C which used Directed Reading Activities (DRA) as the control group, while class 8H becomes the experimental group which used Directed Reading Thinking Activities (DRTA). Independent and dependent (paired) sample t-tests were used to analyze the data. The research finding showed: 1) there were no significant differences of posttest score among the students taught by using DRTA and those taught by using DRA strategy in reading comprehension teaching, 2) there were significant effects of using DRTA in reading comprehension teaching for grade eight students. DRTA strategy was believed to give more contribution (82%) than DRA strategy which contributed only 77%. In conclusion, DRTA was effective strategy in reading comprehension teaching.


Keywords


DRTA; DRA; teaching reading comprehension

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afzali. K. (2012). The impact of instructing self-questioning in reading literary texts in Sheikhbahaee University. International Journal of Linguistics, 1948-5425. Vol. 4, No. 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i2.1862.

Almasi, J.F., & Susan K.F. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. 2nd edition. NY: GuilfordPress.

Aloqaili, A. M. S. (2011). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: a theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University-Language Translation. doi:10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001

Anil. B. (2015). Higher order questioning in SL classroom. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol.8 PP.47-55. Retrieved from http://ubplj.org/index.php/bjll/article/

Brookhart, S.M. (2010). How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD.

Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles, second edition. New York: Pearson Education.

Brown, H.D. (2004). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Browne, A. (2001). Developing language and literacy 3-8 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publication.

Chaemsai, R., & Rattanavich, S. (2016). The directed reading-thinking activity (DRTA) and the traditional approach using tales of virtue based on his majesty the king’s teaching concepts in Seventh grade students’ reading comprehension. Canadian Center of Science and Education. English Language Teaching, 9, 1916-4750.

Chaffee, J. (2012). Thinking critically tenth edition. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Crawford, A. E. et al. (2005). Teaching and learning strategies for the thinking classroom. New York: The International Debate Education Association.

El-Koumy, Abdel Salam Abdel Khalek. (2006). The effects of directed reading thinking activity on EFL students’ referential and inferential comprehension. Paper, Unpublished, Suez Canal University, Egypt. Retrieved on April 2017 from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2365150

Fahim, M. & Aghaalikhani. H. (2014). The relationship between critical thinking and reading ability of EFL university students in iran islamic azad university. Journal of Current Research In Science Vol. 2, No. 2. pp: 240-243. Www.Jcrs010.Com.

Feng. Z. (2013). Using teacher questions to enhance EFL students’ critical thinking Ability in Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, P.R. China. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. Vol.2, No.2; www.sciedu.ca/jct.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of english language teaching. Third Edition. London: Longman.

Hasan, A. (2018). The effects of DRA and DRTA methods on students’ reading comprehension for state Islamic senior high school. American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, 281-287. DOI:10.12691/education-6-3-16.

Hassani, M.T. & Rahmany, R. (2013). The relationship between iranian EFL learners’ critical thinking and reading comprehension performance in journalistic texts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 1873-1878. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.10.1873-1878

Jacobson, E., & Sally, I. (2007). Reading comprehension: research and teaching strategies. California: the California Adult Literacy Professional Development Project (CALPRO) of the American Institutes for Research.

Jonson, K.F. (2006). 60 Strategies for improving reading comprehension in Grades K-8. California: Corwin Press a SAGE Publications Company.

Richards, J.C., & Richard, S. (2002). Longman, dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd Ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.

Richardson, J.S., & Morgan, R.F. (2009). Reading to learn in the content areas 7th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Roe, Betty. D & Sandy H.Smith (2012). Teaching reading in today’s elementary school, eleventh edition. Canada: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

Stauffer, R.G. (1969). Directing reading maturity as a cognitive process. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

Willingham, D.T. (2007). Critical thinking why is it so hard to teach?. Psychological Science, 7, 337-342.

Yazdani, M.M., & Mojtaba, M. (2015). The explicit instruction of reading strategies: directed reading thinking activity vs. guided reading strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 4, 2200-3452.

Zohar. A. & Dori. Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 145-181.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v4i2.250

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web: www.jeltl.org; Email:journal.eltl@gmail.com


Creative Commons License
JELTL by http://www.jeltl.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Indexed and Abstracted BY: