Two Uses of Gender in Conversation: A Membership Categorization Analysis

Najib Bouhout


Discourse analysts have for a long time focused on the study of gender differences in language. Recent approaches, however, eschew that concern in favor of studying the performative aspects of gender. In line with this, Membership Categorization analysis offers the additional advantage of studying societal members’ gender categorization in conversation, the way it shapes the course of conversation, and its import, and consequences, for the conduct of participants in interaction. Membership Categorization Analysis is used here to spot some practical uses of gender by interactants in mundane talk among friends. More specifically, the article analyses two conversational instances where interactants deploy the categories ‘men’ and ‘manly practices’ to realize particular actions in conversation (suggestion and blame attribution). One finding is that gender categorization does pragmatic actions in interaction. In addition, the article argues that the relevance of gender, as one textual given among many, must be analytically demonstrated empirically in the conduct of interactants rather than invoked for the theoretical concerns of the discourse analyst.


gender; discourse; Membership Categorization Analysis; action; conversation

Full Text:



Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage Publications.

Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.

Díaz, F. (2012). Category sets and category-bound activities: Identity from the standpoint of members. In N. Bozatzis & T. Dragonas (Eds.), The discursive turn in social psychology(pp. 63-73). Retrieved from

Edwards, D. (1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 15-33). London: Sage Publications.

Fitzgerald, R., Housley, W., & Butler, C. W. (2009). Omnirelevance and interactional context. Australian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 45-64.

Gee, P. J. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 19-50). New Jersey: Routledge.

Have, P. T. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J. Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179-192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America & International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.

Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-23). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kessler, S., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kitzinger, C. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10(2), 163-193. doi:10.1177/0959353500010002001

Kitzinger, C. (2005). "Speaking as a heterosexual": (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-Interaction? Research on Language & Social Interaction, 38(3), 221-265. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2

Kitzinger, C., & Rickford, R. (2007). Becoming a `bloke': The construction of gender in interaction. Feminism & Psychology, 17(2), 214-223. doi:10.1177/0959353507076554

Lepper, G. (2000). Categories in text and talk A practical introduction to categorization analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Liddicoat, A. (2007). An Introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.

Nilan, P. (1994). Gender as positioned identity maintenance in everyday discourse. Social Semiotics, 4(1-2), 139-162. doi:10.1080/10350339409384431

Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2012). Preference. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210-228).

Psathas, G. (1999). Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies, 22(2-4), 139-162. doi:10.1023/a:1005422932589

Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939-967. doi:10.2307/1519752

Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735. doi:10.2307/412243

Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social Structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (p. 44–70). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165-187. doi:10.1177/0957926597008002002

Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On complainability. Social Problems, 52(4), 449-476. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449

Schegloff, E. A. (2007a). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007b). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462-482. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007

Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Smith, P. (1985). Language, the sexes and society. Oxford: Brasil Blackwell.

Speer, S. A. (2005). Gender talk: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. London: Routledge.

Stokoe, E. (2006). On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial reference to gender in talk-in-interaction. The Sociological Review, 54(3), 467-494. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2006.00626.x

Stokoe, E. (2010). Gender, conversation analysis, and the anatomy of membership categorization practices. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(7), 428-438. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00261.x

Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277-303. doi:10.1177/1461445612441534

Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2012). Mundane morality: Gender, categories and complaints in familial neighbour disputes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 9(2), 165-192. doi:10.1558/japl.v9i2.25735

Stokoe, E. H. (2000). Toward a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse. Feminism & Psychology, 10(4), 552-563. doi:10.1177/0959353500010004018

Stokoe, E. H. (2004). Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: Current developments in language and gender research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(2), 107-129. doi:10.1191/1478088704qp007oa

Watson, D. R. (1978). Categorization, authorization and blame - negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105-113. doi:10.1177/003803857801200106

Watson, R. (1997). Some general reflections on 'categorization' and 'sequence' in the analysis of conversation. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 47-76). Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.

Weatheral, A. (2002). Towards understanding gender and talk-in-interaction. Discourse & Society, 13(6), 767-781. doi:10.1177/0957926502013006756

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125-151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002

Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2008). Using conversation analysis in feminist and critical research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 555-573. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00049.x



  • There are currently no refbacks.

JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics); Web:; Email:[email protected]

Creative Commons License
JELTL by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Indexed and Abstracted BY: